[Lofarpwg] LOTAAS binary pulsar + 20 timing paper

[Daniele]

Hi Chia Min,

I'm sorry about the delay, with the upcoming summer I've had a few
important deadlines. I will try sending you comments by next week if
that's ok.

Cheers,
Daniele


On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 09:00, Chia Min Tan <
chiamin.tan at postgrad.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi everyone
>
>
> I'm still waiting for comments for the timing paper. If you have any
> comments on the paper, can you let me know so I know whom I should expect
> reply from? If possible can you send me your comments within 2 weeks from
> now?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Chia Min
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Chia Min Tan
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 18, 2019 4:38:41 PM
> *To:* lofarpwg at astron.nl <lofarpwg at astron.nl>
> *Subject:* LOTAAS binary pulsar + 20 timing paper
>
>
> Hi everyone
>
>
> I have completed a draft of my LOTAAS timing paper which includes the
> first binary pulsar discovered by LOTAAS and 20 other sources. In the
> paper, I have provided timing solutions, multi-frequency observations to
> study profile evolution and to measure spectral indices. There are also
> separate sub-sections for the binary pulsar and J1657+3304 which shows flux
> density variation of a factor of 10 over 300 days.
>
>
> One notable issue I have now is to explain why did our sensitivity not
> improve as much as expected when we correct for the pointing positions
> towards the pulsars from follow-up positions to timing positions. The worry
> here is the systemic errors we get for not accounting for the less than
> expected sensitivity. Currently I used the measured flux densities as it is
> if the change in positions is less than 1 arcmin and only use the
> observations with corrected positions for changes that are more than 1.5
> arcmin (There are no pulsars with offsets between 1 and 1.5 arcmin).
>
>
> Anyways, let me know if you have any comments on any aspects of the paper.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Chia Min
> _______________________________________________
> lofarpwg mailing list
> lofarpwg at astron.nl
> http://mailman.astron.nl/listinfo/lofarpwg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.astron.nl/pipermail/lofarpwg/attachments/20190805/52542096/attachment.html>